On January 27th Google Fiber announced four more metro areas: Atlanta, Charlotte, Nashville, and Raleigh-Durham.
Still waiting on word for the other five metro areas that were interested in.
Here's the link to follow progress with each city:
https://fiber.google.com/newcities/
Google Fiber's blog post about the announcement:
http://googlefiberblog.blogspot.com/2015/01/google-fiber-is-coming-to-atlanta.html
Saturday, February 7, 2015
Tuesday, December 9, 2014
Which Cloud Storage Provider is the Fastest?
Most applications and services people use day to day on the Internet were designed with users only having access to normal broadband speeds in mind. When a user suddenly has Gigabit Internet, it can make the rest of the Internet feel slow in comparison. I thought it might be helpful to compare providers for different Internet applications and services and show which ones are the fastest (and therefor the "best" to use with Google Fiber.) I'll be comparing them only by speed and nothing else.
First up is Cloud Storage Providers.
I came up with the four most popular providers I could think of and tested both their Windows application and website for upload and download speed with the same 572MB test file. All tests are wired in, downloading/uploading the test file from an SSD, each direction was only tested once.
Note: iCloud Drive doesn't have a Windows app, so I tested their website only.
Second Note: Graphs are measuring speed in Megabytes per second (MB/s)
Test Machine:
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP1
Google Chrome was used for Website tests
Google Fiber's speed was verified using their KC speedtest server before running these tests (at least 940Mb/s up and down)
Dropbox is the clear winner among the Windows Apps with the highest average speeds.
The result for fastest website was less clear. Apple iCloud had the fastest upload, while Google Drive had the fastest download. Overall Apple iCloud had the fastest combined average upload/download speed.
If you have ideas for other stuff to test or think I screwed this test up, feel free to leave a comment.
First up is Cloud Storage Providers.
I came up with the four most popular providers I could think of and tested both their Windows application and website for upload and download speed with the same 572MB test file. All tests are wired in, downloading/uploading the test file from an SSD, each direction was only tested once.
Note: iCloud Drive doesn't have a Windows app, so I tested their website only.
Second Note: Graphs are measuring speed in Megabytes per second (MB/s)
Test Machine:
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit SP1
Google Chrome was used for Website tests
Google Fiber's speed was verified using their KC speedtest server before running these tests (at least 940Mb/s up and down)
Dropbox is the clear winner among the Windows Apps with the highest average speeds.
The result for fastest website was less clear. Apple iCloud had the fastest upload, while Google Drive had the fastest download. Overall Apple iCloud had the fastest combined average upload/download speed.
If you have ideas for other stuff to test or think I screwed this test up, feel free to leave a comment.
Monday, December 1, 2014
Google Fiber Austin - First Fiberhoods Are Open for Sign-Ups
The first five fiberhoods in Austin, TX are open for sign-ups starting today!
Bluebonnet Deadline 1/29/2015 All met their goal except one!
Lady Bird Lake Deadline 3/12/2015 All met their goals!
Emerald Forest Deadline 4/23/2015 All met their goals!
Ben White Deadline 6/4/2015 All met their goals except three.
Onion Creek Deadline 7/16/2015 All met their goals except eight.
https://fiber.google.com/cities/austin/fiberhoods/
https://fiber.google.com/cities/austin/fiberhoods/
Sunday, November 9, 2014
Google Fiber Business Service
Google Fiber's Business service is switching from the pilot to early access phase.
Gigabit service will cost $100 a month during the early access phase at least. Guaranteed price for one year. Plus $20/mo for one static IP, $30/mo for five static IPs. Looks like they get the standard Network Box that everyone else gets or they can use their own equipment.
As of 11/14 there are now many more fiberhoods covered by Google Fiber Business. This was expanded to include certain fiberhoods in Austin, TX on 12/1/14.
They took the map down that showed what areas small business service covers in KC. You have to enter an address to check now.
https://fiber.google.com/smallbusiness/
As of 11/14 there are now many more fiberhoods covered by Google Fiber Business. This was expanded to include certain fiberhoods in Austin, TX on 12/1/14.
They took the map down that showed what areas small business service covers in KC. You have to enter an address to check now.
https://fiber.google.com/smallbusiness/
Saturday, October 4, 2014
Google Fiber - KC Northeast and KC Northwest Delays
People in the KC Northeast area have received an email stating the installation goal date is now Summer 2015 and in the KC Northwest area they received an email stating the installation goal date is now Spring 2015.
These are goal dates for the whole area. Specific fiber hoods inside the area, particularly ones that had the highest signup percentage over their goal will likely be installed sooner than the goal dates.
The only information I've been able to get so far on the cause of the delays is that they are having major delays in creating the infrastructure and they are expecting a harsh winter to slow down crews.
These are goal dates for the whole area. Specific fiber hoods inside the area, particularly ones that had the highest signup percentage over their goal will likely be installed sooner than the goal dates.
The only information I've been able to get so far on the cause of the delays is that they are having major delays in creating the infrastructure and they are expecting a harsh winter to slow down crews.
Tuesday, August 26, 2014
Google Fiber Kansas City Phase III Pre-registration
Central Johnson County, KS has opened for sign-ups today. This includes Merriam, KS, part of Shawnee and part of Lenexa, KS. Deadline to signup for Central Johnson County is October 30th.
Johnson County Northeast which includes Westwood, Westwood Hills, Mission Woods and Roeland Park is getting close to the end of their pre-registration period. September 12th is the deadline for Johnson County Northeast.
All of the fiberhoods in Central Johnson County met their goal!
Johnson County Northeast which includes Westwood, Westwood Hills, Mission Woods and Roeland Park is getting close to the end of their pre-registration period. September 12th is the deadline for Johnson County Northeast.
All of the fiberhoods in Central Johnson County met their goal!
Saturday, July 12, 2014
Google Fiber - "What speed do you really get?"
I've heard the question "What speed do you really get?" a lot since I've had Google Fiber installed. I thought I would show a few examples and explain why some of them might be misleading.
*All of these examples were taken wired in, to take wireless out of the equation.
First, a speedtest to Google Fiber's KC speedtest server. (kansas.speedtest.googlefiber.net) ~1 ms away
This is close to the best speeds you'll ever see. 941 Mbps down and 941 Mbps up is pretty much the max, the rest (~60 Mbps in each direction) is protocol overhead. If you want to understand why there is so much protocol overhead this is an excellent article that explains it. Protocol Overhead by Phil Dykstra
Next is a speedtest to Google Fiber's Mountain View speedtest server. (speed.googlefiber.net) ~40 ms away
Something seems odd here, why is the download so much slower than the upload?
The Google Fiber speedtest uses a different method to test download then it uses to test upload. The method they use to test download works fine with very low latency but does pretty bad at just 40ms of latency. The upload speed still looks great though.
Here's the speedtest to Google Fiber's Provo speedtest server. (provo.speedtest.googlefiber.net) ~23 ms away
At 23ms away the download speed went up a little but it's lower than the true speed still. Upload looks great.
In case you don't trust Google Fiber's own speedtest, here's what speedtest.net looks like. (Disclaimer: Google setup their own speedtest server for speedtest.net. It can only be used by Google Fiber customers.)
Google had to setup their own server because most test servers on speedtest.net can't handle testing a Gigabit connection.
The ~800 Mbps download is odd because the exact same servers that are used for speedtest.googlefiber.net are used as speedtest servers for speedtest.net. Both speedtests were written by Ookla and use the same ports and test data.
It appears the flash speedtest that Google uses handles minor hiccups during the test much better than speedtest.net's flash speedtest does though.
My conclusion is that Google Fiber really does provide 1 Gbps down and up. Speedtests just aren't great at showing connections of that speed yet, especially over any distance.
**If you have an older computer, even if it has a gigabit network card, you won't be able to reach the max speed that Google Fiber offers with flash speedtests.
UPDATE 8-17-2014:
It looks like tweaks have been made to the speedtest servers. Here are new results as of 8-17-2014:
KC Speedtest

Mountain View Speedtest
Note: speed.googlefiber.net no longer points to the Mountain View speedtest server, use this link instead spd101.nuq1.googlefiber.net
Provo Speedtest
KC Speedtest.net
*All of these examples were taken wired in, to take wireless out of the equation.
First, a speedtest to Google Fiber's KC speedtest server. (kansas.speedtest.googlefiber.net) ~1 ms away
This is close to the best speeds you'll ever see. 941 Mbps down and 941 Mbps up is pretty much the max, the rest (~60 Mbps in each direction) is protocol overhead. If you want to understand why there is so much protocol overhead this is an excellent article that explains it. Protocol Overhead by Phil Dykstra
Next is a speedtest to Google Fiber's Mountain View speedtest server. (speed.googlefiber.net) ~40 ms away
Something seems odd here, why is the download so much slower than the upload?
The Google Fiber speedtest uses a different method to test download then it uses to test upload. The method they use to test download works fine with very low latency but does pretty bad at just 40ms of latency. The upload speed still looks great though.
Here's the speedtest to Google Fiber's Provo speedtest server. (provo.speedtest.googlefiber.net) ~23 ms away
At 23ms away the download speed went up a little but it's lower than the true speed still. Upload looks great.
In case you don't trust Google Fiber's own speedtest, here's what speedtest.net looks like. (Disclaimer: Google setup their own speedtest server for speedtest.net. It can only be used by Google Fiber customers.)
Google had to setup their own server because most test servers on speedtest.net can't handle testing a Gigabit connection.
The ~800 Mbps download is odd because the exact same servers that are used for speedtest.googlefiber.net are used as speedtest servers for speedtest.net. Both speedtests were written by Ookla and use the same ports and test data.
It appears the flash speedtest that Google uses handles minor hiccups during the test much better than speedtest.net's flash speedtest does though.
My conclusion is that Google Fiber really does provide 1 Gbps down and up. Speedtests just aren't great at showing connections of that speed yet, especially over any distance.
**If you have an older computer, even if it has a gigabit network card, you won't be able to reach the max speed that Google Fiber offers with flash speedtests.
UPDATE 8-17-2014:
It looks like tweaks have been made to the speedtest servers. Here are new results as of 8-17-2014:
KC Speedtest
Mountain View Speedtest
Note: speed.googlefiber.net no longer points to the Mountain View speedtest server, use this link instead spd101.nuq1.googlefiber.net
Provo Speedtest
KC Speedtest.net
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)